PSP PC Wii PS3 360 DS
 

Go Back   Console Chat: Video Game Community > The Bulletin Board > Editorials > Featured Reviews

Featured Reviews Share your own personal reviews for any video game here. Featured and user reviews will be displayed here. Just make sure you follow format and make it as long as possible. Staff will make sure you follow orders.

Comment
 
LinkBack Review Tools Display Modes
A Fire Emblem Player Review of: Fire Emblem: Shadow Dragon
Published by GuruSharky
08-17-2009
Author review
Game PlayN/A
GraphicsN/A
SoundN/A
Replay ValueN/A
OverallN/A
Average N/A%
Default A Fire Emblem Player Review of: Fire Emblem: Shadow Dragon

This review is to show you what a real fire emblem fanatic thinks of Fire Emblem: Shadow Dragon, and whether or not to choose it if you are interested in trying Fire Emblem for the first time. Most of the points in this review will be comparing Fire Emblem: Shadow Dragon to other Fire Emblems in its wake.




Developers: Intellegent Systems
Publisher: Nintendo
Platform: Nintendo DS
Release Dates:
JP: 8/7/08
EU: 12/5/08
NA: 2/16/09
AUS: 2/26/09
Players: Single Player only; Up to 2 Player via Wifi connection
ESRB Rating: E10+


Gameplay & Mechanics:


Fire Emblem 11, more commonly known as Shadow Dragon is a remake of the very first Fire Emblem game known similarly as Dark Dragon. Its gameplay is standard for Fire Emblem titles, the classic turn-based grid system rules still apply here. But there are some major difference that offer this game a SERIOUS disadvantage.

1. NO RESCUING! making it difficult to train weak characters and milk bosses
2. 5 levels are accessible ONLY if you have 15 or less characters in your party, fortunately, only about 8 are actually worth keeping.
3. Everybody sucks! Yeah its true, there are upwards of 30 recruitable characters, ALMOST NONE OF WHICH ARE EVEN SLIGHTLY USEFUL!
4. True hit feels off, giving enemies unfair hit boosts.
5. Growth rates are totally screwed, characters are lucky to reach 20 in most stats if promoted at lv 20.

Don't get me wrong, Shadow Dragon does have a few general improvements. Such as Reclassing which I found ok, but I also felt it gave me a little too much control over the characters themselves. Additionally each class only had a few other possible classes that they could turn into, usually classes that were completely useless for their stats. Thirdly, the fact that some classes were blatently better than all the others *Cough* *dragonmasters* *cough* made me always want to chose them...

I love the forging in Shadow Dragon, it improves on the already solid forging mechanic set by Path of Radiance & Radiant Dawn. The ability to continually make weapons better is ingenius, and it also allows you to make weapons that are MUCH stronger than allowed in FE 9 & 10.

Visuals & Sound:

The music in Shadow Dragon is better than its handheld predecessors, tho does not surpass the music qualities of the consoles FEs.

The character visuals in this game are by far my favorite in fire emblem history, even though marth still looks like a girly man.

The fighting visuals.... welllll how can I say this lightly... make me want to punch myself in the groin repeatedly. You call those 3D graphics? It looks like two poorly made action figures in a well done stop motion movie... And what the hell happened to the awesome attack motions and critical sequences from fire emblems 6,7, and 8!?!?!?! I'm used to mercenaries doing a sweet flip in the air before attacking, now they just short hop and slash like a wimp... I'm disgusted... What has our world come too!?!?!?!

Multiplayer:


Fire Emblem fanatics like myself have always been craving multiplayer that highly surpasses the boring four-square battles of the GBA titles. I admit, when I heard about the wifi in this game, I got excited, fainted, peed my pants (jk), but I got excited.

Now you ask father sharky, "did Shadow Dragon live up to your tinkle-inducing expectations?"

Well child......... Yes and No...

Sure it does give me the single-player mode style, capture the flag gameplay I wanted, but not the way I wanted... First, the turn limit is 10... how can you have a fun fire emblem match in 10 turns? You really can't, since it takes 10 turns to get to the castle or to destroy the other team only if there is a serious power imbalance. Second, you only get teams of five. I'm not really surprised at this limit, though more units on each team equals more fun. Finally, with characters as dismal as the cast of this game how can you make a good team? With such horrible growth rates, your team is usually either way stronger or way weaker than your opponent.

To be honest I haven't really enjoyed any of the whole 15 online matches I'd played.

Sharky's Verdict:


Here's why Shadow Dragon fails my test with falling colors. Sure it's a long anticipated remake featuring Marth (Omg it's Merf! I love you Merf!... Sorry I couldn't resist.) it is little more than a remake. They failed to change a lot of what they should have, all they did was add new features unavailable in past emblems without adding clearly vital gameplay quirks from past emblems.

For many who don't know fire emblem, this will probably be your first one. And if you've already judged the series by this game then fine, but play other fire emblems as well. The only way you can go is up.

Try Fire Emblem Radiant Dawn for Wii or the generic Fire Emblem for GBA.

My verdict is... this is the worst fire emblem I've ever played.

5.5/10
 
By Bounty on 08-17-2009, 10:40 PM
Default

...
HEY, YOU KIND OF COPIED MY GAME! I know it's somewhat different, but I already did this! That's not fair, but, whatever/
Reply With Quote
  #1 (permalink)  
By GuruSharky on 08-17-2009, 10:44 PM
Default

I know I reviewed the same game u did but I did it from the standpoint of a seasoned fire emblem player whereas yours was from the viewpoint of a gamer whose history with Emblem isn't as extensive as mine or has never played a FE game.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
By Frosty the Froman on 09-08-2009, 06:22 AM
Default

While I HATE having to constantly choose whether or not I should sacrifice someone/thing, I still think you judged it a little harshly. I actually liked the fact that they left alot of the old gameplay alone, it lets us see where (in my opinion) the best strategy-game series to date started. Remakes aren't for improving gameplay, they for nostalgia and to let new players experience what came before their time. And I'd hope it's the worst FE game you've played; it's the first! If all the others weren't better, it'd mean Intelligent Systems hasn't be doing their job! I also have some ridiculously strong people (as you'll soon find out) whose stats are well into their 20 and I haven't even gotten around to finishing it yet! I'd give it a 7.5, from one whose been called "The Fire Emblem Master."
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
By GuruSharky on 09-08-2009, 04:33 PM
Default

Hmm perhaps I did rate it a bit harshly, but it really doesn't compare at all to past emblems. This is no blazing swords or radiant dawn my friend.

If remakes are your thing then fine but like I said all this is is a remake of dark dragon with a couple things thrown in like forging and reclassing and online play.

Sure it's nice to look back at emblems roots but they couldve improved the game I. So many ways.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
By Frosty the Froman on 09-08-2009, 11:37 PM
Default

Where do you keep getting Blazing Swords? Do you mean Sacred Stones?

Past Fire Emblems? This was the first.

It wasn't supposed to be like any of the others, it came before them.

I already knew it was a remake of Dark Dragon...where did that come from?

I could be wrong, but I'm pretty sure the reclassing was in the original and was taken out in later games.

I'm not a remake freak, I just like seeing how far we've come. My grade for it was a little harsh, too, but it came from a point of view similar to yours. If I was to grade this as an original title, 7.5 would be about right...but this game came out in 1990...I was barely a year old...judging it based on that would bump the score up as high as a 9.5! You have to remember that this was what started it all. If not for this game, Fire Emblems might be a type of sandwich!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
By GuruSharky on 09-09-2009, 12:12 AM
Default

Blazing swords is the seventh fire emblem, the one before sacred stones and in America it was simply titled Fire Emblem.

And you're right, fire emblem does rest on the shoulders of marth in a sense. If nintendo was planning on making a remake, they did a pretty damn good job. If they were aiming to make it a fantastic recreation of marths story that rivals the perfectionf of other Emblems, then they failed lol.

And what I meant by previous emblems are all
of the games created before shadow dragon, or the ds remake.

Dark dragon was the title of the original famicom release.

And a fire emblem sandwich would be delicious an quite bizarre.
Reply With Quote
Comment

Review Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Our community is not affiliated with or endorsed by Nintendo, Sony, Microsoft,
Or any other video game company, we are an established fan-site.
ConsoleChat.Net - Gaming Community © 2006-2011