Quote:
Originally Posted by Jules
Ok this is a warning, as I do not want this thread to be one where people just argue over which one character is better. Frankly, this should have not even been posted yet since very few have the game. If you are going to post, please explain why one character is better then the other and not just make petty arguments...and certainly do not flame or insult other members because they disagree with you. If this continues it will be closed.
|
Thank you, I like the format of this forum and would like to see it turn into a good brawl forum independent of petty arguments and personal trash talking "My fox cud kick ur falcos ass lol! usuck gg." That said lets reboot this thread as an intelligent discussion beginning with the following:
Fox: In melee he was the highest played tournament character after Marth and was rediculously overpowered in his ability to maintain high priority despite having body based attacks (usually priority goes to things like swords or energy bursts that are not considered hittable parts of the character) and being extremely light and fast. In Brawl he does not appear to hit quite as hard as he did but is still just as fast. His priority is more or less the same but new contenders like Lucas put him to shame. His hit range seems to be a little tighter and his up B doesn't have a lot of impact (unlike Wolf). All in all he's still very good.
Falco: Nintendo appears to have struggled in giving him his own unique moveset and failed in some areas and succeeded in others. The kick reflector is unique and the computer appears to rightly pwn my ass with it whenever it gets the chance. He has kept up his old habits of falling like a sack of bricks and his blaster is unchanged. Like fox his moves feel tighter but have more impact than before. All in all I'd say he's better but I never played both extensively so please submit your input.